Let’s face it, with the healthy lead of 750 million+ users, established by Facebook, Google Plus will take a good while to catch up. Even if the mainstream are to ‘overcome social media fatigue’, that is.
So we plod along on G+, in wonderment of the growing ‘circularity’ of the early adoptscoble, et al.
Meanwhile, most of us have adopted Google’s offering, only half-heartedly. Awaiting that ‘Tipping Point’, when the bulk of our Facebook friends make the switch too.
Meanwhile the digerrati and twitterati, tantalize with tales of G+ goodness. Some, even switching to Google’s social network, without the slightest hesitation.
However, unless the mainstream switches over, G+ will remain a niche social networking site, second fiddle to Facebook. Maybe Google should tackle it another way.
Now, I refer to WordPress loosely even if it is the leading content management system worldwide. What I actually mean is that G+ can probably be a very effective content creation and publication platform, if Google makes it easier for content creators to switch to it, making G+ the publishing platform of choice.
There have always been very good reasons why content creators should own their content. Unlike Facebook, whose business model and lead depends on the data that is created and shared within its gates, Google can afford to open up because it plays King, rather well, elsewhere.
I tried live blogging a recent trip with G+. Uploading images were easier and quicker than on Facebook. Love the way the comments are displayed against each pic etc. However, to make me abandon my blog and thumb my nose at those who warn against doing so, here is what I’d like Google to do:
All this should help users rapidly set up an online presence with a powerful, integrated social layer. The intuitive concept of circles could also help individuals switch seamlessly between private and professional realms.
I’m guessing that as more content creators use G+ as their central hubs, the mainstream will interact with and adopt G+ in increasing numbers. Content creators will finally be able to easily consolidate their online presence and activity.
Before we know it, each individual, will have their own open OR private, ‘ Social Web Hub’ instead of being part of a walled-in ‘social network’.
Google has thrived due to its ability to bring us relevant results. Opening up the G+ platform will probably make it easier for them to do this better. Then the new social layer will, perhaps, allow them to do it the best yet.
Does this make sense to you? Any other way G+ can increase mainstream adoption rates? Maybe some of the features are already implemented or underway? Other thoughts?
So Google Plus is here and there’s a lot of features that seem attractive and set it apart (as of now).
Hangouts or group video chats.
An easy way to organize your contacts based on ‘circles’ of interest . You can do this in Facebook with ‘lists’ but Google’s implementation is more intuitive.
etc.
If you have not already heard about it or want to find out more, Techcrunch has more details for you.
My Mom would probably never use Twitter. Come to think of it, neither would my ‘Facebook’ savvy brothers, one of whom probably has more tech skills than the average bloke (bet he still remembers at least 5 DOS commands)
If only they read the ‘How to‘ books about Twitter, which outnumber by 1:100, similar books about Facebook.
Facebook is intuitive to people like Mom. If Mom needed a book to explain how to use Facebook effectively, she would not be commenting on almost every photo posted on fb; I love you Mom.

Mom may not ever 'get' Twitter
Even so, the information is incomplete. The many literary volumes fail to mention following Twitter idiosyncrasies
Twitter chats are deceptively tricky. E.g.: If you are going into something like a leadership chat, you better have a book on leadership quotes handy. Fail to do this and you could be ‘outleadered’ by eloquently poetic (even painfully grandiose) quo-weets.
These chats light up when someone like a filmmaker from South Florida comes along to exercise his acerbic (and frequently astute) observations.

Ho-hum Twitter chat's can get interesting
This tweing reminds me of hyperactive Hammy from ‘Over the hedge’. The only thing that seems to drive their over-representation in your Twitter feed is, the ever accurate Klout metrics.
The slightest dip in scores and the Klout-bots are likely to go on a Twitter chat rampage, causing Twitter outage.
Until you pray for an acerbic dude to show up, if only to prevent fail whale sightings…but then, unfortunately, Dan cannot be everywhere. He probably has work to do.
I can hardly hold a candle to Seth Godin‘s achievements, but the Dan in me is alarmed that he has released some of his ideas into the wild; open to interpretation by, who knows?
History and even current events are proof that tribal mentality is not always benevolent or progressive. The concept has resonated well, perhaps for all the right reasons, in digital marketing circles.
It has been but a short leap from there, to virtual strudel sharing by members of all Twitter ‘tribes’. O.k I’m generalizing, maybe not all.
These sweet folk derive manage to connect sharing mainly hashtag supported beverages, as a daily ritual.
Here too, Dan may pop in to provide respite from tribal self- aggrandization and backslapping. I have personally had to set aside my tribal hashtag beverage to respond to Dan on one occasion (before I thought him astute enough).
Outleaders, Klout-bots, Tribal strudel sharing and Dan are now an enjoyable, even endearing part of my Twitter feed.
Mom would never ‘get it’ though. Would your Mom?
Let’s Connect