You read right. Web 22.0. Not web 3.0 or web 9.0 or even web 21.0 (all passé…google them) but Web 22.0. You heard it here first.
More about Web 22.0 below…but here’s the set-up first.
I tweeted yesterday, quite innocently, if I may add
‘ Steve Jobs is already working on a better version of you.’
I expected the tweet to go unnoticed since hootsuites magnificent metrics measured my Klout at a bottom scraping 10.
Not to be.
‘@Rawkreative Already standing in line RT @jacobvar: Steve Jobs is already working on a better version of you.’
I already knew that- Facebook had checked him in. I had to warn @rawkreative that things were going to get worse.
‘
be careful, Zuckerberg has hidden the privacy settings on it.’ I subtly twitformed him.
However as a matter of public interest it’s my duty to divulge more in this blog post.
Steve has decided to name that better version of you ‘Web 22.0‘. Holding the iphone correctly is only one of the things that better version of you (called Web 22.0) will be capable of.
Don’t be alarmed. All the ‘social media marketing consultants’ that matter have already written blog posts (not in public domain yet) about how you should behave as Web 22.0.
It’s all laid out for you. Web 22.0 will be your adulthood, its been decided conclusively, you will have an infinitely better existence as Web 22.0.
What is not sure is if the Google, Verizon duo will love you- Web 22.0, on broadband as much as on wireless. Zuckerberg has decided to love you regardless, since you keep no secrets from him. You will be ‘public domain’.
Have any ideas on how Web 22.0 should be? Please feel free to comment or simply open up a wiki page on it and inform me. We can probably have inconsequential but serious deliberations. We can, at the least, laugh at our digitally recorded foolish notions when we finally become what we can be…Web 22.0!.
As the title implies, this is a movie that can probably be watched multiple times. Not that I found it difficult to follow, just that I am sure I missed bits and pieces. Which brings me to the question, why do I care enough to want to go back and fill in the details? Well the answer is that it is a pretty good movie compared to the some of the other stuff thrown our way. However, I do think this movie fell short of the great movie mark. A pity.
The good parts first. Visually amazing. A great way to use effects to tell a story. Nothing felt out of place or over the top. Come to think of it, there were instances when I felt I was watching scenes from ‘2012’ or ‘The day after tomorrow’. Given the plot, these visual déjà vus can be given a pass.
As for the acting… strong performances by Leonardo DiCaprio, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, and Ellen Page. In that order imo. Joseph Gordon-Levitt was particularly impressive in what I think is his first major adult role. We are probably seeing the first glimpses of a promising thespian career. Ken Watanabe did not shine as much as he would have in any of his typically flamboyant roles. Still, a decent supporting performance. The rest of the cast were tight too.
In a movie like this, the plot is the star, and that is a good thing in the era of predictable plot lines. I cannot help feeling that the dialogues did not have to be so wordy and offer a play by play unraveling of the story. If these were handled more subtly, it would have probably helped with character development. I would have preferred to see more fleshed out and motivated characters à la ‘Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind’ (Jim Carrey, Kate Winslet), one of my favourites which shares some plot elements. In my opinionated world, the folk behind ‘Inception’ lost out on the opportunity at making a good movie great by sacrificing in the character development department.
Then again, with ‘Inception’ the plot is the star. Not the characters. Nevertheless, the ending was a tad predictable.
Maybe the director Christopher Nolan made the conscious decision to opt for a more easily digestible commercial fare. Judging by the buzz, he succeeded.
So yeah, it’s worth a watch at the theater and you may feel the need to watch it again to flesh out some of the details you missed the first time around. A good sign.
Go for it!
I’ve heard this line from everyone and their grandmother. Variations are ‘I have this great idea that I want to try’, ‘I’ve always wanted to start my restaurant’ etc…and my telepathic response always is ‘wtf are you waiting for?’. Well I should admit that those are the smart folk. Most people know that there are enough reasons not to trade a steady pay check for an unpredictable lifestyle. Regardless, I thought it’s about time I wrote for those foolish enough to consider indulging in the entrepreneurial call.
About 8 months after a major media launch Google announced that it is going to be canning ‘Wave’. ‘Wave’ apparently did not gain enough momentum to transform into a tsunami and ended up little more than a ripple. Bad puns aside, the case illustrates that even talented proven teams, like the Rasmussen brothers who also gave us Google maps and huge companies like Google who gave us, well…the rest of the internet
… can fail at making a product succeed in the market.
Get a real job:
Statistics show that 8 out of 10 businesses fail within the first three years. I’ve also read (though I cannot find the link) that an average entrepreneur goes through 20 ventures before getting it right. So entrepreneurship is definitely not for the faint of heart. Imagine being fired from 20 jobs prior to finding one you like. It can take its toll.
In other words, statistically, one is more likely to make money at a job than in their own business AND psychologically (even without considering that it’s a lonely climb) most people are probably more equipped to work for someone else than to work for themselves.
In my first post on the subject of entrepreneurship here are my thoughts on what can be considered the two ‘book-ends’ of the entrepreneurial process:
The idea is not that ‘great’:
Many budding entrepreneurs are convinced that the initial ‘Idea’ is worth its weight in gold. They are sure that once the product or service is set up or manufactured, consumers will appear in droves. Build the website, set up the distribution channel or restaurant and away we go! After all, it’s a great idea!
From my experiences as an entrepreneur as well as helping other entrepreneurs move their products to market, I hold the view that the ‘Idea’ by itself is merely a catalyst to the whole process. Optimism is a necessary trait for launching a business. However, it can also be an impediment if no thought is given to how the idea is will be presented to and adopted by the market. Building a product is just the start of the battle. ‘Build it and they will come’ is not really true as most entrepreneurs find out. If Google with all their marketing power, reach and media resources could not get the formula right, it’s not going to be easy for anyone else either. The newer the product or service, the greater the risk… as the Rasmussen brothers have confirmed with their Google ‘Wave’ experiment. In other words, the risk is generally lower if you have a proven product, brand, or service, like your grandfather’s jewelery store passed down to you vs. a franchise vs. a totally new concept in fine dining or technology.
I’ve built it but I cannot sell it:
I’ve often been approached by people offering me an equity in a product if I help them build the technology, website, design etc. It seems like a fair deal at the outset; their idea, my efforts. Not really, considering that if the product does not sell, my efforts are going to be in vain. Any percentage of ‘zero’ is still ‘zero’. For those with similar offers, it’s a good idea to look for the marketing commitment/resources in terms of budget allocated to actually ‘sell’ the product. Educating the customer about a product or service is expensive and/or time consuming. If the entire budget is spent on building a product that nobody knows about, everyone is going to be left with ‘zero’ by the end of it.
Social media tools have made it easier to educate a customer about a product or service. These tools provide businesses easier access to the customer. However, as businesses learn about these tools they also compete with each other for customer attention, increasing the noise that the customer eventually blocks out. Remember those banner ads that you now know how to ignore?
In this environment if one does not have the resources to help stand out from the crowd or at the least use these tools to build relationships using social media platforms, the chances of success diminish. Creating product awareness is often not enough to ensure product/service adoption as once again, the Google ‘Wave’ example shows. In the case of online products, adoption is still a long way from actual profitability or even revenue (in some cases…read on Twitter’s challenges in this regard).
Often the ‘idea’ person is totally unaware about the long road to product/service adoption in the market place, let alone profitability.
Using rapidly evolving social media marketing strategies is a skill in itself. As someone who handles social media accounts including twitter and facebook for my clients, I should probably mention the common mistakes some entrepreneurs make. Too much for this post, maybe later!
Are you a fool?:
Are you?
. Am I being too negative? Well, there’s a reason for the high number of failures in business. At the same time, one has to know that these failures are what help make your next steps or venture even stronger. After all, someone has to create those ‘secure’ jobs everyone likes. That is, if you are foolish enough to give it another go.
Video of Steve Jobs – ‘Stay hungry, stay foolish’.
More to come…
Let’s Connect